top of page
  • admin

Understanding When to Use Force in Security Situations

The use of force in security settings is a subject surrounded by rigorous standards and ethical considerations. It requires a delicate balance between assertive action and the fundamental rights of individuals. Security professionals must be equipped with the insight needed to make informed decisions, emphasizing the importance of training, judgment, and responsibility.

In, understanding the appropriate moments to employ force is paramount. This knowledge not only ensures the safety and security of individuals but also upholds the principles of professionalism and restraint that are central to the role of security personnel. In this guide, let’s demystify the circumstances under which force may be necessary, offering clarity and guidance for those in the field.

Definition of Use of Force 

The term "use of force" in security contexts refers to the application of physical power to manage, guide, or control situations involving potential or actual threats. This can range from verbal commands to, in extreme cases, the use of weapons. The crux of its definition lies in the necessity to protect property, individuals, or oneself from harm, while adhering to legal and ethical standards. Understanding the spectrum and implications of force is crucial for every security operative, forming the foundation of effective and responsible security management.

Security Situations Requiring Use of Force 

  • Immediate Threat to Life

When there's an immediate threat to someone's life, the use of force becomes necessary to protect the victim from harm. Security personnel must quickly assess the threat and intervene to neutralize it, ensuring the safety of all individuals involved. This situation demands a response that is proportional to the level of threat, prioritizing life preservation above all.

  • Active Assault

In the event of an active assault, where an individual is aggressively attacking another person or group, the use of force is justified when stopping the assailant. The primary goal is to prevent the assailant from causing serious harm or injury, with the response tailored to control the situation while minimizing risk swiftly and effectively to bystanders.

  • Preventing a Felony

If a felony is in progress, such as a violent burglary or armed robbery, using force may be necessary to prevent the completion of the crime. Security officers must act decisively to protect potential victims and property, employing force as a means to detain the perpetrator until law enforcement arrives, ensuring the force used is in line with the severity of the threat.

  • Defending Others

When others are in danger of physical harm and cannot protect themselves, the use of force by security personnel to defend them is justified. This includes situations where individuals are unable to escape a threat on their own, and immediate action is required to ensure their safety.

  • Self-Defense

Security personnel have the right to use force in self-defense when directly threatened with violence. The use of force in such instances should be proportional to the threat faced, aimed at neutralizing the threat while avoiding unnecessary harm or escalation.

  • To Prevent Significant Damage

In situations where further damage is imminent and cannot be prevented through non-physical means, the use of force may be necessary. This applies particularly to scenarios where the damage would have serious repercussions or pose further security risks, necessitating immediate and decisive action to safeguard property.

  • Enforcing Legal Orders

When enforcing legal orders or arrest warrants issued by a court or law enforcement, security personnel may need to use force if the subject resists or poses a threat to safety. The application of force in such contexts must be guided by legal standards and the principle of minimal force, ensuring compliance with the law while protecting the rights of all parties involved.

Things to Consider

  • Proportionality

The level of force used must match the severity of the threat, ensuring that actions taken are not excessive relative to the situation. This requires a careful assessment of the threat and a calibrated response that minimizes harm while effectively neutralizing the risk. Proportionality safeguards against unnecessary escalation and upholds the integrity of security operations, emphasizing restraint and precision in crisis situations and defining what is reasonable force.

  • Legal Compliance

Security personnel must be versed in local laws and regulations, ensuring their actions are within legal bounds. This includes understanding the circumstances under which force is justified and the limits of such actions. Legal compliance not only protects individuals involved but also shields security professionals from potential legal repercussions. 

  • De-escalation First

Attempting to resolve situations through communication, negotiation, and conflict resolution strategies can often prevent the need for physical force and security incident escalation protocol. De-escalation emphasizes the importance of empathy, patience, and skilled dialogue in managing threats, aiming to reduce tensions and resolve conflicts peacefully. This approach not only minimizes the risk of injury but also demonstrates professionalism and respect for the dignity of all individuals involved.

  • Training and Preparedness

Comprehensive training in the use of force is essential for security personnel. This includes physical training, scenario-based exercises, and education on ethical and legal aspects. Preparedness encompasses not only the skills to apply force effectively but also the judgment to know when it is necessary and how to execute it responsibly. Ongoing training on the use of force guidelines in security ensures that professionals remain competent in the latest techniques and standards, prepared to act decisively and appropriately in critical situations.

  • Accountability and Reporting

After an incident involving the use of force, documenting and reporting the event accurately is imperative. This includes detailing the rationale for employing force, the methods used, and the outcome of the action. Transparent reporting ensures accountability, providing a clear record for review and assessment. It also plays a critical role in evaluating the appropriateness of the force used and in learning from the incident to improve future responses. Accountability measures reinforce trust in security practices and uphold the commitment to ethical standards.

Understanding when and how to use force in security situations is a complex yet crucial aspect of the role of security personnel. It demands a careful balance of judgment, ethics, and responsibility, guided by continuous training and adherence to legal standards. For those looking to enhance their skills and knowledge in this area, enrolling in a security guard course on the use of force is an invaluable step towards achieving proficiency in the use of force.

Security Guard Group offers comprehensive training designed to prepare individuals for the realities of the field, including the judicious use of force. To learn more about our courses and how we can help you navigate the complexities of security work, please contact us at (226) 667-5048. Equip yourself with the knowledge and skills necessary to excel in the security industry and make informed decisions in critical situations.



bottom of page